 | Suwandschieff, E., Gräter, Y. M., Folkertsma, R., Wein, A., Schwing, R. 2025. Stimulus enhancement in kea, Nestor notabilis, in an object choice task. Animal Behaviour 223: 123166. |
| Suwandschieff, E., Mundry, R., Kull, K., Kreuzer, L., Schwing, R. 2023. ‘Do I know you?’ Categorizing individuals on the basis of familiarity in kea (Nestor notabilis). Royal Society Open Science 10: 230228. |
| Suwandschieff, E., Wein, A., Folkertsma, R., Bugnyar, T., Huber, L., Schwing, R. 2023. Two-action task, testing imitative social learning in kea (Nestor notabilis). Animal Cognition 26: 1395–1408. |
| Suwandschieff, E., Wein, A., Folkertsma, R., Bugnyar, T., Huber, L., Schwing, R. 2023. Correction: Two-action task, testing imitative social learning in kea (Nestor notabilis). Animal Cognition 26: 1409–1409. |
 | Suzuki, H., Thiele, T. R., Faumont, S., Ezcurra, M., Lockery, S. R., Schafer, W. R. 2008. Functional asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans taste neurons and its computational role in chemotaxis. Nature 454: 114–117. |
| Suzuki, R., Buck, J. R., Tyack, P. L. 2005. The use of Zipf's law in animal communication analysis. Animal Behaviour 69: F9–F17. |
| Suzuki, T. N. 2011. Parental alarm calls warn nestlings about different predatory threats. Current Biology 21: R15–R16. |
| Suzuki, T. N. 2012. Long-distance calling by the willow tit, Poecile montanus, facilitates formation of mixed-species foraging flocks. Ethology 118: 10–16. |
| Suzuki, T. N. 2012. Referential mobbing calls elicit different predator-searching behaviours in Japanese great tits. Animal Behaviour 84: 53–57. |
| Suzuki, T. N. 2018. Alarm calls evoke a visual search image of a predator in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115: 1541. |
| Suzuki, T. N. 2019. Imagery in wild birds: Retrieval of visual information from referential alarm calls. Learn Behav 47: 111–114. |
| Suzuki, T. N. 2020. Other Species' Alarm Calls Evoke a Predator-Specific Search Image in Birds. Current Biology 30: 2616–2620.e2. |
| Suzuki, T. N., Griesser, M., Wheatcroft, D. 2019. Syntactic rules in avian vocal sequences as a window into the evolution of compositionality. Animal Behaviour 151: 267–274. |
| Suzuki, T. N., Kutsukake, N. 2017. Foraging intention affects whether willow tits call to attract members of mixed-species flocks. Royal Society Open Science 4: 170222. |
| Suzuki, T. N., Wheatcroft, D., Griesser, M. 2016. Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird calls. Nature Communications 7: 10986. |
| Suzuki, T. N., Wheatcroft, D., Griesser, M. 2017. Wild birds use an ordering rule to decode novel call sequences. Current Biology 27: 2331–2336.e3. |
| Suzuki, T. N., Wheatcroft, D., Griesser, M. 2020. The syntax–semantics interface in animal vocal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375: 20180405. |
| Suzuki, T. N., Zuberbühler, K. 2019. Animal syntax. Current Biology 29: R669–R671. |
| Svádová, K., Exnerová, A., Štys, P., Landová, E., Valenta, J., Fučíková, A., Socha, R. 2009. Role of different colours of aposematic insects in learning, memory and generalization of naïve bird predators. Animal Behaviour 77: 327–336. |
 | Svartberg, K., Tapper, I., Temrin, H., Radesäter, T., Thorman, S. 2005. Consistency of personality traits in dogs. Animal Behaviour 69: 283–291. |
<<First < Previous 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 Next > Last >>