 | Schwarz, S., Wystrach, A., Cheng, K., Kelly, D. M. 2024. Landmarks, beacons, or panoramic views: What do pigeons attend to for guidance in familiar environments?. Learn Behav 52: 69–84. |
 | Schwarzlose, R. F. 2017. Cognition in the modern era. Trends Cogn Sci 21: 57–58. |
 | Schweinfurth, M. K. 2021. Anybody watching? How others affect helpful actions. Learn Behav 49: 5–6. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K. 2021. Cooperative intentions and their implications on reciprocal cooperation in Norway rats. Ethology 127: 865–871. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Aeschbacher, J., Santi, M., Taborsky, M. 2019. Male Norway rats cooperate according to direct but not generalized reciprocity rules. Animal Behaviour 152: 93–101. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Baldridge, D. B., Finnerty, K., Call, J., Knoblich, G. K. 2024. Inter-individual coordination in walking chimpanzees. Current Biology 34: 4338. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Call, J. 2019. Reciprocity: Different behavioural strategies, cognitive mechanisms and psychological processes. Learn Behav 47: 284–301. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Neuenschwander, J., Engqvist, L., Schneeberger, K., Rentsch, A. K., Gygax, M., Taborsky, M. 2017. Do female Norway rats form social bonds?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71: 98. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Stieger, B., Taborsky, M. 2017. Experimental evidence for reciprocity in allogrooming among wild-type Norway rats. Scientific Reports 7: 4010. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Taborsky, M. 2016. No evidence for audience effects in reciprocal cooperation of norway rats. Ethology 122: 513–521. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Taborsky, M. 2017. The transfer of alternative tasks in reciprocal cooperation. Animal Behaviour 131: 35–41. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Taborsky, M. 2018. Reciprocal trading of different commodities in norway rats. Current Biology 28: 594–599.e3. |
| Schweinfurth, M. K., Taborsky, M. 2020. Rats play tit-for-tat instead of integrating social experience over multiple interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287: 20192423. |
| Schweitzer, C., Houdelier, C., Lumineau, S., Lévy, F., Arnould, C. 2010. Social motivation does not go hand in hand with social bonding between two familiar Japanese quail chicks, Coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour 79: 571–578. |
| Schweitzer, C., Lévy, F., Arnould, C. 2011. Increasing group size decreases social bonding in young Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour 81: 535–542. |
| Schwing, R., Jocteur, E., Wein, A., Noë, R., Massen, J. J. M. 2016. Kea cooperate better with sharing affiliates. Animal Cognition 19: 1093–1102. |
| Schwing, R., Meaux, E., Piseddu, A., Huber, L., Noë, R. 2021. Kea, Nestor notabilis, achieve cooperation in dyads, triads, and tetrads when dominants show restraint. Learn Behav 49: 36–53. |
| Schwing, R., Nelson, X. J., Wein, A., Parsons, S. 2017. Positive emotional contagion in a New Zealand parrot. Current Biology 27: R213–R214. |
| Schwing, R., Reuillon, L., Conrad, M., Noë, R., Huber, L. 2020. Paying attention pays off: Kea improve in loose-string cooperation by attending to partner. Ethology 126: 246–256. |
| Schwob, N. 2026. Bonobos know when you don’t: Ape ignorance attribution. Learn Behav 54: 5–6. |
<<First < Previous 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 Next > Last >>